Six Questions You Might Want to Ask When Planning Your Fall Appeal

Six Questions You Might Want to Ask When Planning Your Fall Appeal

 

11 August 2026

 

By David Allen, Development for Conservation

 

The second-best time to plan your Fall appeal campaign is this week – right now – in August. Regular readers of these posts will recognize that I recommend working on your communications planning – INCLUDING your Spring and Fall appeal letters as early as February and March of each year. So August is second-best.

If planning is still ahead of you, consider the following six planning questions for the Fall’s campaign.

 

 1.  Are there donors you should be meeting with personally to update them on their specific interests and ask for their continued support?

The answer is YES, obviously. But planning their approach and solicitation NOW will help your scheduling later (not to mention that they should be removed from your appeal letters segments). You’ll also need a plan for soliciting them if they do not respond to your invitations to meet.

 

2.  For your general pool of donors, how much should you ask for in your letter?

When you ask for a specific amount of money, you raise more money than when you don’t. Further, the more you ask for, the fewer people will respond, but the more money you will raise, up to some practical limit (probably $250). Ask for $35, and you get what you get. Ask for $50, and fewer people will respond, but you raise more money. Ask for $100 – same thing. Even fewer respond. Even more money raised.

I recommend asking for $100 in the first letter. Use a response card with an ask string that starts with $35. $100 would then be the second option. If you send three, ask for $100 again in the second letter. Regardless, drop the ask amount to $35 for the final letter.

 

3.  Will you plan a follow-up letter? More than one?

I regularly hear two things related to follow-up appeal letters. The first is that “we can’t send a follow-up because we can’t afford it. It’s not in the budget.” When I think about this too long, my head hurts. If you send an appeal letter out that loses money, something else is wrong. There will certainly be a point of diminishing returns, but you should be net positive at least for the second and even third mailings this Fall. “I can’t afford it” therefore directly translates to “I can’t afford to raise more money,” which is ridiculous.

The second is that we shouldn’t send another appeal letter, because we will be pestering people. This is based on an assumption that people receive your letter, read it through, and make an informed decision to not give this year. In fact, this is rarely the case. Most people who do not respond either meant to and forgot (having set it aside and put other mail on top of it), or never really received it in the first place. Maybe they didn’t pick up the mail that day, or maybe it simply got round-filed as soon as it came into the house. Sending a reminder isn’t pestering. It’s reminding.

I recommend sending a letter in mid-October, a follow-up to non-responders the week before Thanksgiving, and a second reminder on December 15. If you want to intersperse those letters with email, doing so will help. And if you want to achieve even greater results, call them right before the third letter drops. (“I’m putting this in the mail for you today. Please look for it.”)

 

4.  Does your landing page support your fall appeal campaign?

When your appeal letter asks for $100 and you include a QR code in the letter, the code probably sends people to the landing page that asks for $35, $100, $250, $1,000, and Other, right? So far so good. But what else does the landing page say? Is there a supportive message from the letter signer? Is the theme of the letter, and the essential case argument for giving (including giving at higher amounts), and the call to action all repeated on the page?

I recommend having a website landing page devoted to the Fall appeal campaign. Your letter(s) and email(s), and Giving Tuesday testimonials should all be thematically tied together into a coherent whole. And the landing page should be consistent with the whole as well.

 

5.  What can you say on the outside of the envelope to help people want to open it?

I received an interesting email a few weeks ago in response to one of my earlier posts.

Hi David,

I have a hot take, with zero data to back it up. 30 and 40 something year olds aren’t deluged every day by nonprofit requests.

I’m not writing this to be disagreeable, I just feel like I am constantly hearing folks say that younger people aren’t donating or aren’t getting involved, and I always want to tell them that they’re not asking us.

 

(Thank you, Derek!)

I think this is true more generally than with just 30 and 40 something year olds. My own mailbox load of solicitation mail has dwindled noticeably since COVID. To me, this implies two things. The first is that our mailed appeals will do even better now with less competition. And second, we need to work hard to stand out and get noticed.

Use a non-standard size envelope. Or a different-colored paper. Draw a line through the return address and print or sign someone’s name there (so it appears to come from a specific person instead of the faceless institution). Print a provocative quote on the back side. Or apply a sticker to seal it. Put stuff inside (like pressed flowers, maple leaves, or seed packets) to create texture and interest.

Half the battle is generating a few seconds of interest before she opens it. Remember that you are just one of her charities. (See also, She is Not One of Your Donors). Stand out in her mailbox and get noticed.

 

6.  How will you dance around the election, Thanksgiving weekend, Giving Tuesday, and Christmas?

 

I’ve given you my recommendation. You take it from here.

 

 

Don’t let Fall just happen. Plan for it.

 

Cheers, and have a great week.

 

-da

 

PS: Your comments on these posts are welcomed and warmly requested. If you have not posted a comment before, or if you are using a new email address, please know that there may be a delay in seeing your posted comment. That’s my SPAM defense at work. I approve all comments as soon as I am able during the day.

Photo by Alexas Fotos courtesy of Pixabay.

Share this!
8 Comments
  • Charlie Quinn
    Posted at 13:33h, 11 August Reply

    Ah, you speak the Through, David!

  • Julie Ball
    Posted at 12:14h, 11 August Reply

    Hi David, Long time no see/hear (from my days at the Adirondack Council!). What do you think about asking for specific amounts from very lapsed donors, say five years or more? 1. Keep asking for the last amount given OR 2. a giving level below. OR 3. something like… “a gift at any level would be truly appreciated.”

    • Julie Ball
      Posted at 17:26h, 13 August Reply

      Hi David, so what do you think?

      • David Allen
        Posted at 14:02h, 14 August Reply

        Julie, I would treat very lapsed donors of five years and more almost as if they were brand new donors. The most important outcome is to get them back in the habit of giving at all. For most, I would ask for $35 or other. For those who had given, say, $250 and more, I might ask for $100. And for those with serious capacity, I would prioritize meeting in person and NOT by letter. I have also heard of asking for a gift closer to the average of their three most recent years of giving, but I think that applied mostly to lapsed donors of 3-5 years.

        Thank you for the question!

  • Denise
    Posted at 08:18h, 11 August Reply

    Hi David,
    Thanks for your posts! Our land trust has all-volunteer board and no staff. I am the Development VP (fundraising and membership) and was successful with a recent fundraising campaign using two emails spaced apart to finish raising the $25,000 for a matching grant that will go towards hiring our first staff. This campaign raised about $5 K. (Now there’s $50 K in the staff fund!) I am only using email because of the time involved in a mailing. The next scheduled fundraising campaign, seeking RMD’s, is planned for early October. The constituent list for the RMDs will be much smaller. Am I missing the boat by not using direct mail? I could probably handle a very targeted mailing with a little help. What are your thoughts on not using direct mail for fundraising? I’m retired, but I don’t want to be spending 20+ hours a week on this volunteer gig. I have a very full life!

    Thanks!

    Denise

    • David Allen
      Posted at 08:48h, 11 August Reply

      Denise, Thank you so much for writing! I totally appreciate the scenario you describe – all-volunteer, not enough time, very full life, and so on. It comes with the territory. The bottom line on direct mail is that raising money for anything less than an emergency will always benefit from mail. You will receive more responses, raise more money, and engender more member and donor loyalty over a longer period of time. For renewals, I usually advocate leading with email and following with mail to those who don’t respond within a week. For appeals, I typically use the reverse – lead with mail and supplement with email. If you can’t do both, I would prioritize sending mail over email, but using both is more effective.

      Having said all that, have you considered the possibility of getting help? Talk to your local High School environmental club – perhaps they need a project. Many communities have a version of an RSVP (Retired Senior Volunteers Program). Maybe if you organized it, the Board would assemble the mail. For a few dollars, a High School or community college student might be willing to help. And you might find that a local mailhouse is less expensive than you thought. I suggest trying one of these options, testing the results, and learning from the experience. If you do, please share. I’d love to highlight your experience.

      Thanks again for the comment!

      -da

  • A.B.
    Posted at 07:32h, 11 August Reply

    Aha! I’ve sent this one to an executive director currently functioning without a development staffer. Your clear, actionable advice might get him through a rough patch. Thank you! (PS: So odd how English asks us to pronounce “ough” as “oo” and “uff” in the same sentence. But that’s a different blog entirely.)

    • David Allen
      Posted at 08:52h, 11 August Reply

      Though, when I think this through, it always seems rough – but it ought not to be! Thanks for this – I needed a little lift today.

Leave a Reply